Wednesday, May 27, 2015

What's the Scoop on Dietary Fiber?

Information about dietary fiber seems to pop up everywhere you look these days and probably for good reason.  There is more research available each day to show the many benefits of dietary fiber for the health of people and animals.  Fiber comes from plant cell walls and is a type of carbohydrate that is not digested by the enzymes present in mammals. This type of carbohydrate is comprised of four major components which are distinctly different in chemical composition.   These four carbohydrate types are, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin/gums.

Although fiber isn’t digested by the enzymes naturally occurring in mammalian digestive systems, gastrointestinal microbes help to ferment fiber, producing short-chain fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) that are used for energy or other biological processes. In ruminants, fiber is degraded into rumen, which is the main source of nutrition for the animal. Fermentation in monogastric species occurs in the cecum and/or colon.

Food sources of fiber are generally classified in two categories, soluble and insoluble, but there are several subtypes of fiber within these two categories.  Soluble fiber binds with fatty acids and allows blood sugars to release more slowly into the body. They also help lower LDL (bad) cholesterol.  Insoluble fibers assist with hydration of waste and control the pH levels in the intestines.  

The world of fiber continues to evolve and recently functional fibers such as oligosaccharides have been included in the definitions of food sources of fiber.  Resistant starch (RS) includes starch and starch degradation products that escape from digestion in the small intestine of healthy individuals. Resistant starch is also more recently considered a third type of dietary fiber; it exhibits benefits of insoluble fiber and some of the benefits of soluble fiber.

Measurement of fiber is a fairly complex process and requires different methodologies for the different types of fiber. Common methods at EPL BAS include measurement of Crude Fiber, Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), and Total Dietary Fiber.  We can also measure Lignin and Total Starch.

Crude fiber (CF) analysis removes free sugars and starch. This alkaline hydrolysis removes protein, some carbohydrates, some hemi-cellulose and lignin and does not measure soluble fiber. Crude fiber is only 1/7 to 1/2 of total dietary fiber.
Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) refers to the insoluble fiber within a plant cell wall and is comprised of cellulose and lignin.
Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) is a value comprised of ADF plus insoluble hemicellulose.  The ADF value can be subtracted from the NDF value to reach a figure close, but not exactly equal to CF.

Total Dietary Fiber (TDF) allows for separate measurement of total fiber, insoluble fiber, and soluble fiber. This method is unable to measure many oligosaccharides.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

What's Up With the Birds and Bees?

What is a pollinator, why are pollinator important and why are we hearing so much about them now?Pollinator Study
Many plants need help from insects, such as bees, to reproduce and produce seeds and fruit that are part of our diet.  There are a variety of other pollinators, including mammals such as bats, birds, reptiles (lizards) and other insects like butterflies.
Most of us have heard, in recent years, about something called colony collapse disorder.  In this disorder, worker bees essentially disappear from a colony leaving behind the queen, the food sources and immature bees with a few nurse bees.  Historically, there are reports of this phenomenon periodically as far back as the late 1800s, however, in 2006-2007 unusually high losses were being reported with very few dead bees observed near the hives.
Do we know what causes this disorder?
There are several potential reasons that include:
  • Pathogens
  • Other pests such as mites
  • Poor nutrition due to loss or change in habitat
  • Lack of genetic diversity
  • Transport and overwork
  • Pesticide usage
What is being done about this problem?
A variety of organizations including non-profit, private and governmental agencies have been involved in working to find causes and solutions for pollinator health issues.  In 2014, a US presidential memorandum set the stage for creation of a federal strategy to promote the health of honey bees and other pollinators.  The US EPA published documents to provide guidance for risk analysis for pesticides and performance of pollinator health studies.
What part does EPL play in pollinator health studies?
Pollinator studies create new challenges for those involved in assurance that new crop protection products are safe.  EPL is a contract analytical laboratory that has been working with others to develop the best analytical capabilities for pollinator health studies.   In January 2015, EPL was invited to participate in a pollinator health workshop sponsored jointly by representatives from Syngenta and Bayer. EPL representatives included Sara Sharp, Study Director and Team Lead for AgChem and Fred Claussen, Vice President of EPL.  EPL analyzes pollen, nectar and flowers to monitor and quantify the concentration of pesticides and other agrochemicals.  The workshop was held in association with the annual meeting of the National Alliance of Independent Crop Consultants.   Fred presented information related to the variety of matrices involved in these studies.  He also talked about some of the analytical challenges and improvements that may be possible in the future such as implementation of high throughput technologies.  If you have questions or need analytical support for pollinator health studies, please contact Fred or Sara.

EPL BAS Wins Another Award

EPL Bio Analytical Services (EPL BAS), a global leader in providing the latest and best technology and services, has been awarded “Outstanding Small Business Award” by the Decatur Chamber of Commerce.  EPL BAS provides data that that has been used to support literally hundreds of crop protection products.  Since the company’s inception in 1987, EPL BAS has focused exclusively on agricultural science, building a reputation in the industry for quality, compliance, flexibility and customer service.IMG_7033
The Outstanding Small Business award, presented at the Annual Chamber Awards Ceremony on 8/13/14, honors member businesses, agencies, and individuals who have shown outstanding performance, quality customer service, and business distinctiveness in our community. EPL BAS was one of nine local businesses nominated.  Congratulations to our Team!

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

We've Recently been Awarded ISO Accreditation - What Does That Mean to You?

For years, EPL Bio Analytical Services has operated in compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards.  Recently, we have gained accreditation to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories (ISO 17025:2005) with additional requirements outlined in the 2010 AOAC International Guidelines for Laboratories Performing Microbiological and Chemical Analyses of Food and Pharmaceuticals.What changes did we have to make to meet these requirements, and why should potential customers, including those looking to place GLP work, consider this accreditation when evaluating us as a company?

GLP vs. ISO 17025

Currently in the US, “GLP” is basically a self-certification.  A laboratory states that it performed a certain study in compliance with GLP standards and then may be audited after the fact by its customer or the EPA.  However, with recent government cutbacks, there are few EPA auditors available to evaluate these studies.  Furthermore, each country sets its own GLP standards, which means that a study conducted in compliance with US GLP standards may not meet the requirements to be submitted in Europe.  ISO 17025 is an internationally accepted standard that is the same country to country.  EPL underwent a rigorous on-site assessment by A2LA (a non-profit company accredited to perform these assessments) to be granted accreditation.  To keep our accreditation, we will undergo a biennial on-site assessment with a smaller, off-site review of our procedures in the off years.

GLP standards place the emphasis for compliance on an individual study, while ISO 17025 accreditation applies more to processes and methodologies.  Whether it is a GLP study of 700 samples or a single sample with no regulatory requirements, our ISO accreditation assures the customer that we have the technical and managerial procedures in place to consistently deliver valid data that will be accepted all over the world.

Continuous improvement

Because we are a flat company, we were already very focused on improving our processes.  We know when a change in efficiency, cost, or turn around time has had an impact because we can see it in the amount of work we get, how quickly we can handle that work, and ultimately in our paychecks!  However, ISO 17025 required us to formalize that process.  We developed a Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) system and database to keep track of our projects.  It has really helped us to improve the effectiveness of these projects because it forced us to:

·      Perform Root Cause Analysis so that we were treating the cause of the problem rather than the symptoms,

·      Break large projects down into smaller, easier-to-tackle action items,

·      Make it clear who is responsible for each action item and by when it should be done,

·      Keep records of what we did and why we did it that institutional knowledge is not lost when an employee leaves,
,
·      and Monitor changes formally to ensure that the project did what we intended it to do.

This CAPA system is also supported by the rigorous internal auditing we were already doing to comply with GLP standards.  Expanded from our Quality Assurance Unit, our Internal Audit Team monitors all methods and processes for adherence, conformance to regulatory/standard requirements, and effectiveness.

When we are continually improving our processes, our customers benefit because we can provide higher and higher quality data in less time at the lowest cost possible!

A Focus on the Customer


ISO 17025 is much more focused on satisfying the customer than the GLP standards.  We already work very closely with our customers to ensure that we are meeting their requirements, so many of the ISO requirements were already in place (in fact, it is worrisome to think that there are laboratories out there that do not follow the best business practices outlined in this standard).  As with continuous improvement, it was more about formalizing the processes we already had in place. We have begun sending surveys at key points in projects and keeping a log of feedback obtained elsewhere.  Any issues or complaints brought up by our customers trigger Corrective Action as described in the system above.  Everything we do, from the lab to the office to the boardroom, is for the customer, not for regulatory agencies, and ISO 17025 emphasizes that.

Quality of Results


Although the GLP standards are very specific about how to perform and document a study, they are not as detailed regarding the actual quality of data generated.  There are many requirements of ISO 17025 that ensure the quality and consistency of results produced by the lab:

·        Training: Initial and ongoing competence must be evaluated prior to authorization of an analyst to begin or continue running a method.  Proof of this competence (e.g. results that meet our quality criteria, proficiency testing)  is retained in our analysts’ training files

·       Method Validation: New methods or significant changes to current methods must meet accuracy and precision criteria prior to use.  Other criteria determined by the method or customer may also be taken into account.

·       Measurement Uncertainty/Traceability: Measurement uncertainty is the error inherent in any measurement, while traceability is the ability to identify and add up all those errors throughout a method.Because it had not been a requirement of our customers in the past,EPL had to develop a method for estimating the measurement uncertainty for our methods.  Also, to provide measurement traceability, we began using only ISO 17025 accredited calibration service providers and reference material producers to support the work on our scope.  Our already rigorous equipment calibration, verification, and maintenance schedules also help to ensure our analyses can give the level of measurement uncertainty needed.

·       Ensuring the Quality of Test Results: Once a method is validated, it is still important to ensure that the individual sample results are accurate and precise:
  • Internal QC material: In most analyses a Quality Control sample is evaluated against an internally developed control range to determine set acceptance.  This chart also allows us to monitor for biases and stop trends before they start.  Internal QC material may also be fortified to determine recovery
  • Proficiency Testing: EPL is participating in an increasing number of proficiency testing studies.  These studies allow us to compare our results to those of other labs testing the same sample.  Proficiency testing is a way to assure the international community that we can get the same number for the same sample as a lab in Japan, Germany, etc.
  • Other quality assurance methods: There are many other methods we employ to assure the quality of our results, including analysis of Certified Reference Material, running of check standards, evaluation of reagent blanks, etc.

·       Scope of Accreditation: Although our quality management system applies to the entire business,the Scope of Accreditation is the list of the specific methods for which A2LA has accredited EPL.  Assessors watched each method in progress or had an analyst walk them through the procedure.  They scrutinized equipment maintenance records and reagent supplies.  We currently have 27 methods on our Scope of Accreditation, but we will continually to add to it.

Our Commitment to Quality



Besides enrolling in proficiency testing programs and estimating measurement uncertainty, we really didn't have to make any substantial changes in the way that we perform our analyses because we already employ scientific best practices in our work everyday.  Changes in processes outside the lab were similarly minor.  However,preparing for this accreditation has already made us a better company and it is gratifying to be recognized for the quality we pursue above and beyond the regulations we follow. This external recognition will allow us to serve new areas of the market and should also give our current customers added confidence in the product they receive from us.


Monday, November 4, 2013

EPL Bio Analytical Sevices Wins Global AGROW Award

The AGROW Awards are a much-coveted stamp of approval for creativity and innovation in the crop protection industry. Started in 2007 as a global platform for showcasing industry achievements, the awards have become hugely successful and have now developed into a key platform for those wanting to do business with the leaders in crop protection. EPL BAS is thrilled announce they were chosen to win in 2013 as Best Supporting Role.


The Best Supporting Role Award recognizes the company that has contributed most to the global crop protection industry through the provision of support services. Judges look for a company that offers outstanding client support, excellence in service provision and a willingness to go the extra mile for its customers. Congratulations Team EPL!

Monday, August 5, 2013

How to Choose the Best Contract Analytical Laboratory to Support Your Company or Project

It can really be a daunting task to find the right laboratory partner for your company as there are literally thousands of laboratories providing a broad range of support for everything from engineering, to pharmaceuticals to food and agricultural products.  The internet can make the search easier, but it can also increase the confusion.

Some of the things you may want to consider and some questions you might want to ask when interviewing a potential laboratory partner:

Overall experience level of employees:
  • What is the average tenure of employees at the lab?
  • What is the average experience level of lab employees?
  • Is there ongoing employee training and industry involvement?
For example see http://www.eplbas.com/index.php/2012-12-02-22-20-37/icons-2
What is the history of the company?
  • How long has the company been around?
  • Do they have experience doing the type of work you need performed?
  • Do they have the background to understand your industry and specific needs?
  • What is the size and capacity of the lab?
  • Where is the lab located and what are the turnaround times?

What analytical tools and methods are used by the lab?
  • Does the lab use screening tools like NIR and test kits or do they use primary reference methods?
  • Do they have the latest technology?
  • Do they "validate" methods used in the lab against your specifications?

Does the lab have experience with your matrix or sample type?


What quality standards are implemented?
  • How are results reported?
  • Does the lab comply with required regulatory or other certifications?
Does the lab customize analytical support or provide only routine analyses?
  • Does the lab comply with required regulatory or other certifications?
  • What processes are used to facilitate communication and partnership?
  • How transparent is information between organizations?
For example see http://www.eplbas.com/index.php/joomla/customized-research-support

Fortunately...there are no wrong or right answers to these questions, for example a start-up lab may be a perfect solution for your needs if they have previous experience, a good communication process and the right equipment.  A routine lab may be the best solution if you only need standardized results using non-primary methods and a very quick turnaround time.

I bet you thought I forgot price?  Not really, although that is often the first consideration, it should really be the last question, because if the lab cannot meet your needs, the price is irrelevant.  There are many really great labs, so do your homework and you are sure to find a laboratory that will become a great partner to your organization.

Please follow the link below if you are interested in EPL analytical services.  We would be happy to talk with you about how we might meet your testing needs.
http://www.eplbas.com/index.php/2012-12-02-22-13-06/warp5

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Failure Rate for Product Chemistry Studies

We recently attended the CropLife America/Rise Spring Conference.  In a session entitled EPA Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) - Supporting Credible Science, we learned that only 50% of the Product Chemistry Studies submitted were considered compliant with GLP. 

In 2012 alone, 15 Product Chemistry Studies were actually rejected!  It appears most likely that the primary reason for this issue is that often, sponsors may be inexperienced with Product Chemistry Studies and are using labs that do not have extensive experience with GLP compliance and/or OPPTS Product Chemistry Studies.  There are several experienced labs, each with an excellent reputation in this area, but perhaps there are many more that are trying to do these studies without that depth of knowledge. 

What should a sponsor look for in a partner to develop data for Product Chemistry Studies?  Look for a successful history, an example can be found at  http://www.eplbas.com/index.php/2012-05-03-00-11-57.  It is also important to assure the laboratory you choose has an excellent quality and compliance team, for an example see http://www.eplbas.com/index.php/zoo/quality-services.  You may also want to hire a consultant to help you through the process.

We would be interested to hear your ideas and experiences with Product Chemistry Studies.http://www.eplbas.com/index.php/joomla/agricultural-chemistry